|
Parry, et al. vs. Amoco
Production Co., n/k/a
BP America Production Co.
La Plata County, Colorado - Case No. 94 CV 105
On May 16, 1994, Plaintiffs sued Amoco on behalf of
themselves and a class of 4,500 royalty owners for allegedly
underpaying royalties due on natural gas produced from leases located
in La Plata and Archuletta Counties in southwestern Colorado.
On August 26, 2005, the parties entered into a
Memorandum of Understanding, wherein they agreed to settle the
lawsuit.
On October 31, 2005, Judge David Dickinson of the
District Court of La Plata County, Colorado, signed an Order in which
he preliminarily approved the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement
executed by the parties and directed that a Notice of Class Action and
Proposed Settlement be sent to members of the Plaintiff Class.
During the entire period (nearly eleven and one-half
years) that this suit has been pending, the Plaintiffs and the
Plaintiff Class have been represented by Thomas D. Kitch, Gregory J.
Stucky, and David G. Seely of Fleeson, Gooing, Coulson & Kitch, L.L.C.,
in Wichita, Kansas, and G. R. Miller of McDaniel, Baty, Miller, Agro,
Wales & Robbins, L.L.C., in Durango, Colorado.
On or before November 4, 2005, plaintiffs’ counsel
mailed a copy of the Notice to each class member at the most recent
address known to Amoco. A Fairness Hearing was held on December 7, 2005 and December
21, 2005. At its conclusion, the Court approved the settlement and
the application for attorney fees and expenses.
Since Final Judgment was not entered until December 21, 2005, the
schedule for implementing the settlement has been pushed back one
month. Defendant BP America will cease taking GTC deductions as of
the March 2006 production month and royalty checks issued for that
month (i.e. in May 2006) will no longer be reduced by such
deductions. Finally, the parties now expect Defendant BP America,
through its agent, Garden City Group, Inc., to issue refund checks
on or about June 30, 2006.
Pursuant to the settlement, BP has filed two sets of
preliminary distribution schedules. One set, which was filed
November 3, 2005, is called the Preliminary Distribution Schedule.
The second, which was filed on March 22, 2006, is called the Preliminary
Distribution Schedule -- Tribal Deductions. The first relates
to the deductions taken by BP, and the second relates to deductions
taken by Southern Ute Indian Tribe. Under the terms of the
settlement BP will refund to certain members of the plaintiff class
both types of deductions.
If you are a member of the Plaintiff Class holding a
royalty instrument that has been placed in Subclass 2 or 3 (see Notice
for explanation of the Subclasses), you can determine the gross amount
of the refund (excluding any refunds for Tribal deductions), plus interest, calculated by Amoco through the period
ending June 30, 2005, by locating your BP Owner Number on one of the
two Preliminary Distribution Schedules below.
In 2003, BP changed owner numbers for all its interest
owners. The Preliminary Distribution Schedule-Former Owner Numbers
contains the owner number BP assigned to you before 2003. The former
BP owner numbers appear in ascending order. Your former BP owner
number is on the front of the envelope in which the Notice was mailed
to you.
The Preliminary Distribution Schedule–Current Owner
Numbers contains the owner number currently assigned to you. The
current BP owner numbers appear in ascending order. The current owner
number can be found on your current monthly remittance statements.
Each Preliminary Distribution Schedule contains 3
sections –"Gross Proceeds," "Federal Method, and "All Other." Your
owner number may appear on more than one of the spreadsheets
associated with those sections. Be sure to check each of the 3
sections to see whether your owner number appears.
The amounts shown on the Preliminary Distribution
Schedules will be adjusted upward for accumulated interest from June
30, 2005, to the date of distribution, for any deductions taken by BP
from June 30, 2005, to approximately the effective date of the
settlement, and for any Tribal Deductions to be refunded, plus
interest. These adjusted amounts will be reduced by attorneys fees,
expenses and any severance and conservation taxes due on those
amounts.
The Distribution Schedule -- Tribal Deductions
contains both sets of BP Owner Numbers described above. By use
of either owner number, you can determine the gross amount of the
refund for Tribal deductions, plus interest, to the period ending
June 30, 2005. The amount shown on the Preliminary
Distribution Schedule -- Tribal Deductions will be adjusted for
accumulated interest from June 30, 2005 to the date of distribution.
These adjusted amounts will be reduced by attorneys fees, expenses
and any severance and conservation taxes due on those amounts.
The following Index identifies significant documents
which were filed in the case. Among those documents are the Notice of
Proposed Settlement, the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement, and the
Preliminary Distribution Schedules, described above. You may view
these documents using Adobe Acrobat Reader. If you do not already have
the Reader on your computer, it may be downloaded from Adobe by
clicking on the following logo:
|
03/22/06 |
Preliminary Distribution Schedule - Tribal Deductions
Gross Proceeds
All Other Class Owners
|
|
03/22/06 |
Notice of Filing Redacted, Non-Confidential Preliminary
Distribution Schedules -- Tribal Deductions (Schedules 1 and 2) |
|
12/21/05 |
Final
Judgment of the Court |
|
12/19/05 |
Plaintiffs'
Notice of Non-Filing and Request to Take Judicial Notice |
|
12/16/05 |
United Dairy
Farmers Inc.'s Notice of Withdrawal of Objection |
|
12/15/05 |
Plaintiffs'
Response to Objector's Request for Documents and Information |
|
12/12/05 |
Objector United
Dairy Farmers Inc.'s Request for Documents and Information |
|
12/01/05 |
Plaintiffs'
Response to Defendant's Motion to Determine Class Status |
|
11/29/05 |
Plaintiffs' Application
for Allowance of Reasonable Attorney Fees and Expenses |
|
11/29/05 |
Plaintiffs'
Memorandum in Support of Application for Allowance of Reasonable
Attorney Fees and Expenses |
|
11/28/05 |
Defendant's
Motion to Determine Class Status |
|
11/28/05 |
United Dairy Farmers
Inc. Notice of Objection and Motion for Continuance |
|
11/03/05 |
The Preliminary Distribution Schedule-Former Owner Numbers
Gross Proceeds
Federal Method
All Other |
|
11/03/05 |
Preliminary Distribution Schedule–Current Owner Numbers
Gross Proceeds
Federal Method
All Other |
|
10/31/05 |
Notice of
Proposed Settlement of Class Action |
|
10/31/05 |
Order
Preliminarily Approving Settlement Agreement, Approving Form of
Notice, and Scheduling Fairness Hearing |
|
10/31/05 |
Joint Motion (1)
To Enter Order, Preliminarily Approving Settlement Agreement,
Approving Form of Notice, and Scheduling Fairness Hearing, and
(2) To Establish A Hearing Date for the Joint Motion
*Stipulation and Settlement Agreement Attached* |
|
07/18/05 |
Defendant’s
Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment On Behalf of
Members of Subclass 2 Holding Leases which Require Defendant to
Pay Royalties In The Manner Required By Federal Leases |
|
07/01/05 |
Defendant’s Motion
for Partial Summary Judgment on Moratory Interest |
|
06/29/05 |
Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Summary Judgment on Behalf of Members of Subclass 2 Holding
Leases which Require Defendant to pay Royalties In The Manner
Required by Federal Leases |
|
05/10/05 |
Order On
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Require Amoco to Account |
|
02/07/05 |
Plaintiffs’
Closing Memorandum In Support Of Their Motion to Require Amoco
to Account |
|
02/07/05 |
Order (on Plaintiffs’
Unopposed Motion to File Plaintiffs’ Closing Memorandum in
Support of Their Motion to Require Amoco to Account)
|
|
02/02/05 |
Plaintiffs’ Unopposed
Motion to File Plaintiffs’ Closing Memorandum in Support of
Their Motion to Require Amoco to Account |
|
01/31/05 |
Defendant’s
Additional Memorandum Regarding Plaintiffs’ Third Request for
Accounting |
|
01/24/05 |
Order on Amoco’s
Unopposed Motion to File Memorandum Addressing Points in
Plaintiffs’ Response to Amoco’s Surreply |
|
01/20/05 |
Defendant’s Unopposed
Motion to File Memorandum Addressing New Points Raised for First
Time in Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant’s Surreply (Re
Plaintiffs’ Third Request for Accounting) or in the Alternative
for Oral Argument |
|
01/07/05 |
Plaintiffs’ Response
to Defendant’s Surreply to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Require Amoco
to Account for Deductions Taken by Red Willow and its Use of the
Monies it Wrongfully Withheld |
|
12/21/04 |
Defendant’s Notice
of Errata in Defendant’s Surreply in Opposition to Plaintiffs’
Third Request for Accounting |
|
12/20/04 |
Defendant’s
Surreply in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Third Request for
Accounting |
|
11/24/04 |
Plaintiffs’
Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Require Amoco to Account for
Deductions Taken by Red Willow and its Use of Monies Wrongfully
Withheld |
|
11/15/04 |
Defendant’s
Amended Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Third Request for Accounting |
|
11/04/04 |
Defendant’s
Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Third Request for Accounting |
|
09/15/04 |
Plaintiffs’
Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Require Amoco to
Account for Deductions Taken by Red Willow and for Amoco’s Use
of the Monies it Wrongfully Withheld from its Royalty Payments
to Subclasses 2 and 3 |
|
09/15/04 |
Plaintiffs’
Motion to Require Amoco to Account for Deductions Taken by Red
Willow and for Amoco’s Use of the Monies it Wrongfully Withheld
from its Royalty Payments to Subclasses 2 and 3 |
|
02/02/04 |
Order on Pending
Motions for Reconsideration and C.R.C.P. 59 Motions |
|
01/14/04 |
Plaintiffs’ Reply
Regarding Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration or Amendment of
Order on Marketability and Reasonableness of Cost |
|
01/13/04 |
Defendant’s Reply
Brief in Support of “Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification
of October 6, 2003 “Order on Marketability and Reasonableness of
Costs” Concerning Reasonableness of Gathering, Treatment, and
Compression Costs, and Alternative C.R.C,P. 59 Motion to Amend
Findings |
|
01/13/04 |
Defendant’s Reply
Brief in Support of Defendant’s Motion to Clarify Order on
Effect of Division Orders, and Alternative C.R.C.P. 59 Motion to
Amend Findings |
|
12/23/03 |
Plaintiffs’
Response to Amoco’s Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification
of October 6, 2003 “Order on Marketability and Reasonableness of
Costs” Concerning Reasonableness of Gathering, Treatment, and
Compression Costs, and Alternative C.R.C.P. 59 Motion to Amend
Findings |
|
12/23/03 |
Plaintiffs’
Response to Amoco’s Motion to Clarify Order on Effect of
Division Orders, and Alternative C.R.C.P. 59 Motion to Amend
Findings |
|
12/05/03 |
Defendant’s
Memorandum Brief in Support Of Motion for Reconsideration or
Clarification of October 6, 2003 ”Order on Marketability and
Reasonableness of Costs” Concerning Reasonableness of Gathering,
Treatment, and Compression Costs, and Alternative C.R.C.P. 59
Motion to Amend Findings |
|
12/05/03 |
Defendant’s
Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of October 6, 2003
“Order on Marketability and Reasonableness of Costs” Concerning
Reasonableness of Gathering, Treatment, and Compression Costs,
and Alternative C.R.C.P. 59 Motion to Amend Findings |
|
12/05/03 |
Plaintiffs’
Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration
or Amendment of Order on Marketability and Reasonableness of
Costs |
|
12/05/03 |
Plaintiffs’
Motion for Reconsideration or Amendment of Order on
Marketability and Reasonableness of Costs |
|
12/05/03 |
Defendant’s
Memorandum in Support of Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Clarify
or Reconsider Order on Admission of Records Produced by Amoco,
and Alternative C.R.C.P. 59 Motion to Amend Findings |
|
12/05/03 |
Defendant’s Unopposed
Motion to Clarify or Reconsider Order on Admission of Records
Produced by Amoco, and Alternative C.R.C.P. 59 Motion to Amend
Findings |
|
12/05/03 |
Defendant’s
Memorandum in Support of Defendant’s Motion to Clarify Order on
Effect of Division Orders, and Alternative C.R.C.P. 59 Motion to
Amend Findings |
|
12/05/03 |
Defendant’s Motion to
Clarify Order on Effect of Division Orders, and Alternative
C.R.C.P. 59 Motion to Amend Findings |
|
12/05/03 |
Defendant’s
Memorandum and Brief in Support of Defendant’s Motion to
Reconsider October 6, 2003 and October 30, 2003 Orders
Concerning Applicability of C.R.C.P. 59. |
|
12/05/03 |
Defendant’s Motion to
Reconsider October 6, 2003 and October 30, 2003 Orders
Concerning Applicability of C.R.C.P. 59. |
|
10/06/03 |
Order on
Marketability and Reasonableness of Costs |
|
10/06/03 |
Order on Effect of
Division Orders |
|
10/06/03 |
Order on Admission
of Records Produced by Amoco |
|
08/15/03 |
Stipulation
Concerning Supplemental Affidavit of Betty Cole |
|
10/04/02 |
Plaintiffs’
Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law |
|
10/04/02 |
Defendant’s
Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law |
|
08/29/02 |
Stipulation
Affidavit of Betty Cole |
|
08/13/02 |
Approval of
Partial Settlement |
|
07/23/02 |
Order - Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Separate Individual
Claims |
|
07/08/02 |
Stipulation
Concerning Partial Settlement |
|
07/01/02 |
Defendant’s
Response to Filing of Supplemental Authority Supportive of
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
|
|
06/24/02 |
Plaintiffs’
Filing of Supplemental Authority Supportive of Plaintiffs’
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Savage v. Barrett) |
|
06/14/02 |
Plaintiffs’
Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment Requiring Amoco to Refund all Deductions (Except Taxes)
Taken from Royalty Payments Under Instruments Placed in Subclass
2 |
|
05/24/02 |
Defendant
Amoco Production Company’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs’
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Requiring Amoco to Refund
all Deductions (Except Taxes) Taken from Royalty Payments Under
Instruments Placed in Subclass 2 |
|
05/23/02 |
Order on Amoco’s
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Retroactivity
|
|
05/21/02 |
Order (On
Defendant’s Motion to Define the Class Period ) |
|
05/17/02 |
Defendant’s Reply
Brief in Support of Motion to Define Class Period |
|
05/17/02 |
Defendant’s
Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on
the Non-Retroactive Effect of Garman and Rogers |
|
05/03/02 |
Plaintiffs’
Memorandum Brief in Opposition to Amoco’s Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment on the Non-Retroactive Effect of Garman
and Rogers |
|
05/03/02 |
Plaintiffs’ Response
to Defendant’s Motion to Define the Class Period |
|
04/25/02 |
Order -
Defendant’s Motion for Decertification as a Class Action |
|
04/15/02 |
Defendant’s
Amended Answer to First Amended Complaint |
|
04/15/02 |
Defendant’s
Memorandum Brief in Support of Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment on the Non-Retroactive effect of Garman and
Rogers |
|
04/15/02 |
Defendant Amoco
Production Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the
Non-Retroactive effect of Garman and Rogers |
|
04/15/02 |
Defendant Amoco’s
Withdrawal of Motion to Change Subclass Categorization of “Gross
Proceeds” Instruments and to Determine Non-Retroactive Effect of
Rogers “Silence” Rule |
|
04/15/02 |
Plaintiffs’
Withdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Obligating
Amoco to Refund Deductions (Except Taxes) Taken from Royalty
Payments to Members of Subclass 2 Holding “Gross Proceeds”
Leases |
|
04/15/02 |
Plaintiffs’ Motion
for Partial Summary Judgment Requiring Amoco to Refund all
Deductions (Except Taxes) Taken from Royalty Payments under
Instruments Placed in Subclass 2 |
|
04/15/02 |
Defendant’s
Motion to Define the Class Period |
|
03/21/02 |
Order of
Dismissal Without Prejudice (“Starting Point” Claims) |
|
03/21/02 |
Order of
Dismissal Without Prejudice (Plaintiffs’ Claims for punitive
damages, including those asserted in the Fifth, Sixth, and
Eighth Claims of Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint) |
|
03/21/02 |
Order of
Dismissal Without Prejudice (Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Claims of
Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint) |
|
03/21/02 |
Stipulation Concerning
“Starting Point” Claims |
|
03/21/02 |
Stipulation
(Plaintiffs’ Claims for punitive damages, including those
asserted in the Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Claims of Plaintiffs’
First Amended Complaint) |
|
03/21/02 |
Stipulation (Fifth,
Sixth and Eighth Claims of Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint) |
|
01/14/02 |
Defendant’s
Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Decertify Class |
|
01/14/02 |
Plaintiffs’
Reply Brief in Support of their Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment Requiring Amoco to Refund Deductions (Except Taxes)
Taken from Royalty Payments to Members of Subclass 2 Holding
“Gross Proceeds” Leases |
|
12/21/01 |
Plaintiffs’
Memorandum in Opposition to Amoco’s Motion to Decertify |
|
12/21/01 |
Amoco’s Response
in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
Obligating Amoco to Refund Deductions (Except Taxes) Taken from
Royalty Payments to Members of Subclass 2 Holding “Gross
Proceeds” Leases |
|
11/19/01 |
Defendant’s Reply
Brief in Support of Motion to Change Subclass Categorization of
“Gross Proceeds” Instruments and to Determine Non-Retroactive
Effect of Rogers “Silence” Rule |
|
11/06/01 |
Plaintiffs’
Response to Defendant’s Motion to Change Subclass Categorization
of “Gross Proceeds” Instruments and to Determine Non-Retroactive
Effect of Rogers “Silence” Rule |
|
11/06/01 |
Plaintiffs’
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Obligating Amoco to Refund
Deductions (Except Taxes) Taken from Royalty Payments to Members
of Subclass 2 Holding “Gross Proceeds” Leases |
|
11/01/01 |
Plaintiffs’
Memorandum Brief in Support of their Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment Obligating Amoco to Refund Deductions (Except Taxes)
taken from Royalty Payments to Members of Subclass 2 Holding
“Gross Proceeds” Leases |
|
11/01/01 |
Defendant’s
Memorandum Brief in Support of Motion to Decertify Class |
|
11/01/01 |
Defendant’s Motion
to Decertify Class |
|
10/09/01 |
Defendant’s
Reply Brief in Further Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment |
|
10/09/01 |
Defendant’s Reply
Brief in Further Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment on
Plaintiffs’ Separate Individual Claims |
|
10/01/01 |
Statement of
Plaintiffs’ Position Regarding Starting Point Claim |
|
09/25/01 |
Defendant’s
Memorandum Brief in Support of Motion to Change Subclass
Categorization of “Gross Proceeds” Instruments and to Determine
Non-Retroactive Effect of Rogers “Silence” Rule |
|
09/25/01 |
Defendant’s Motion
to Change Subclass Categorization of “Gross Proceeds”
Instruments and to Determine Non-Retroactive Effect of Rogers
“Silence” Rule |
|
08/06/01 |
Plaintiffs’
Response to Defendant’ Motion for Summary Judgment on
Plaintiffs’ Separate Individual Claims |
|
08/06/01 |
Plaintiffs’
Response to Defendant’s Brief in Support of Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment (Tort Claims) |
|
05/04/01 |
Defendant’s Brief
in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment |
|
04/27/01 |
Defendant’s
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Class Action claim) |
|
04/27/01 |
Defendant’s
Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’
Separate Individual Claims |
|
04/27/01 |
Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Separate Individual Claims |
|
04/27/01 |
Defendant’s
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (tort claims) |
|
02/12/01 |
Defendant’s Reply
Brief in Support of Motion to Change and to Establish Subclass
Categorization of Certain Instruments |
|
01/25/01 |
Plaintiffs’ Response
to Amoco’s Motion to Change and to Establish Subclass
Categorization of Certain Instruments |
|
12/22/00 |
Defendant’s
Memorandum Brief in Support of Motion to Change and to Establish
Subclass Categorization of Certain Instruments |
|
12/22/00 |
Defendant’s
Motion to Change and to Establish Subclass Categorization of
Certain Instruments |
|
06/15/99 |
Order on Case
Management Order |
|
03/26/99 |
Order -
Change of Venue |
|
02/04/99 |
Defendant’s
Reply Brief in Further Support of Amoco’s Motion for Protective
Order Staying Discovery Pending Decision of Motion to Stay
Proceedings |
|
02/04/99 |
Defendant’s
Reply Brief in Further Support of Amoco’s Motion to Stay
Proceedings |
|
01/15/99 |
Plaintiffs’
Brief in Opposition to Amoco’s Motion for Protective Order
Staying Discovery Pending Decision of Motion to Stay Proceedings |
|
01/08/99 |
Defendant’s
Memorandum in Support of Amoco’s Motion for Protective Order
Staying Discovery Pending Decision of Motion to Stay Proceedings |
|
01/08/99 |
Defendant
Amoco’s Motion for Protective Order Staying Discovery Pending
Decision of Motion to Stay Proceedings |
|
01/08/99 |
Defendant’s
Brief in Support of Motion to Stay Proceedings |
|
01/08/99 |
Defendant’s
Motion to Stay Proceedings |
|
10/09/98 |
Defendant’s
Reply Brief in Further Support of Amoco’s Motion to Change Venue
Pursuant to C.R.C.P. Rule 98(g) |
|
09/18/98 |
Plaintiffs’
Response to Defendant’s Brief in Support of Motion to Change
Venue |
|
08/28/98 |
Defendant’s
Brief in Support of Motion to Change Venue Pursuant to C.R.C.P.
Rule 98(g) |
|
08/28/98 |
Defendant’s
Motion to Change Venue Pursuant to C.R.C.P. Rule 98(g) |
|
07/29/98 |
Order -
Motion to Bifurcate |
|
06/17/98 |
Confidentiality Agreement and Agreed Protective Order |
|
05/21/98 |
Plaintiffs’
Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Bifurcate |
|
05/01/98 |
Affidavit of
David E. Brody in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Bifurcate
|
|
05/01/98 |
Defendant’s
Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Bifurcate |
|
04/13/98 |
Plaintiffs’
Motion to Bifurcate and Memorandum in Support |
|
03/06/98 |
Order -
Categorization of Royalty and Overriding Royalty Instruments |
|
02/18/98 |
Case
Management Order |
|
01/26/98 |
Defendant’s
Supplemental Brief in Support of Categorization of Royalty
Instruments - Overriding Royalties |
|
01/26/98 |
Plaintiffs’
Categorization Brief in Connection with Instruments Submitted to
Amoco on November 19, 1997 |
|
11/06/97 |
Plaintiffs’
Submission of Leases in Compliance with this Court’s Order dated
October 23, 1997 (w/o exhibits) |
|
11/03/97 |
Order -
Accounting and Master |
|
10/23/97 |
Order -
Categorization of Royalty Instruments |
|
10/23/97 |
Order -
Motion to Place Instruments into Subclass 2 |
|
10/02/97 |
Order
Excluding Southern Ute Tribe Allottees from Plaintiff Class |
|
09/26/97 |
Plaintiffs’
Reply to Amoco’s Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion
to Place Certain “Proceeds” Royalty Instruments into Subclass 2 |
|
09/16/97 |
Defendant
Amoco’s Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Place Certain
“Proceeds” Royalty Instruments into Subclass 2 |
|
08/29/97 |
Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Place Certain
“Proceeds” Royalty Instruments into Subclass 2 |
|
08/29/97 |
Motion to Place Certain “Proceeds” Royalty Instruments into
Subclass 2 |
|
08/29/97 |
Plaintiffs’
Memorandum Regarding Disputes in Categorization of Royalty
Instruments |
|
08/29/97 |
Defendant’s
Brief in Support of Categorization of Royalty Instruments |
|
08/29/97 |
Stipulation
and Agreement |
|
08/01/97 |
Order on
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Accounting |
|
07/25/97 |
Defendant
Amoco’s Supplemental Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs’
Motion for Accounting (w/o appendix) |
|
07/25/97 |
Plaintiffs’
Supplemental Brief in Support of Their Motion for an Order
Directing Defendant to Account and Appointing a Master Pursuant
to C.R.C.P. 53 (w/o exhibits) |
|
04/17/97 |
Order -
Motions for Sanctions |
|
04/17/97 |
Citation to
Show Cause |
|
03/31/97 |
Plaintiffs’
Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Sanctions |
|
03/21/97 |
Defendant
Amoco Production Company’s Response to Motion for Sanctions |
|
03/06/97 |
Plaintiffs’
Motion for Sanctions |
|
02/20/97 |
Order -
Motion to Reconsider |
|
02/18/97 |
Defendant
Amoco’s Motion to Reconsider and Suggestion of Oral Argument |
|
02/18/97 |
Defendant
Amoco’s Reply Regarding Costs and Response to Motion to Comply |
|
02/12/97 |
Order - Costs
of Class Notification |
|
02/07/97 |
Plaintiffs’
Motion to Require Defendant to Comply with this Court’s Order of
October 17, 1996 |
|
02/03/97 |
Plaintiffs’
Response to Motion Regarding Costs of Class Notification |
|
01/16/97 |
Memorandum Brief in Support of Amoco’s Motion Regarding Costs of
Class Notification |
|
01/16/97 |
Motion Regarding Costs of Class Notification |
|
10/17/96 |
Order on
Notice to Class Members |
|
09/06/96 |
Order -
Subclass Description |
|
09/03/96 |
Order -
Summary Judgment |
|
08/30/96 |
Defendant
Amoco Production Company’s Brief on Proposed Subclasses |
|
08/29/96 |
Plaintiffs’
Brief in Connection with their Proposed Definition of Subclasses |
|
07/15/96 |
Order - Class
Certification |
|
05/29/96 |
Order -
Motions for Protective Orders |
|
05/20/96 |
Reply to Plaintiffs’ Brief in Opposition to Amoco Production
Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment |
|
05/03/96 |
Plaintiffs’
Brief in Opposition to Amoco’s Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment |
|
04/22/96 |
Defendant
Amoco Production Company’s Reply to Plaintiffs’ Response in
Opposition to Amoco’s Motion for and Evidentiary Hearing
Regarding Class Certification |
|
04/08/96 |
Plaintiffs’
Reply Brief in Support of Motions for Protective Orders for
Class Members and Representatives |
|
04/08/96 |
Plaintiffs’
Reply to Defendant Amoco’s Additional Response to Plaintiffs’
Motion for Class Certification |
|
04/08/96 |
Plaintiffs’
Response in Opposition to Amoco’s Motion for an Evidentiary
Hearing Regarding Class Certification |
|
04/01/96 |
Defendant’
Brief in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment |
|
03/29/96 |
Defendant
Amoco Production Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment |
|
03/29/96 |
Defendant
Amoco Production Company’s Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing
Regarding Class Certification |
|
03/29/96 |
Defendant
Amoco Production Company’s Additional Brief in Response to
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification |
|
03/27/96 |
Defendant
Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order Regarding
Communications with Class Members |
|
03/05/96 |
Defendant
Amoco Production Company’s Initial Response to Motion for
Protective Order Regarding Communications with Class Members |
|
02/23/96 |
Defendant’s
Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order Regarding
Communications with Class Members |
|
02/05/96 |
Plaintiffs’
Brief in Support of Motion for Protective Order Regarding
Communications with Class Members |
|
02/05/96 |
Plaintiffs’
Motion for Protective Order Regarding Communications with Class
Members |
|
12/20/95 |
Plaintiffs’
Supplemental Memorandum in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Class Certification |
|
08/15/95 |
Defendant
Amoco’s Response to the Court’s Minute Order Regarding Class
Certification |
|
08/15/95 |
Defendant’s
Answer to First Amended Complaint |
|
07/31/95 |
Minute Order |
|
07/31/95 |
Order -
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 12(b)(5) |
|
05/04/95 |
Plaintiffs’
Reply to Amoco Production Company’s Brief in Opposition to
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and for an Order
Directing Defendant to Account and Appointing a Master Pursuant
to C.R.C.P. 53 |
|
04/10/95 |
Defendant’s
Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment and for an Order Directing Defendant to Account and
Appointing a Master Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 53 |
|
03/29/95 |
Defendant
Amoco Production Company's Reply to Plaintiffs' Brief in
Response to Amoco's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to C.R.C.P.
12(b)(5) |
|
03/29/95 |
Defendant's
Reply in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended
Complaints |
|
03/27/95 |
Plaintiffs’
Reply to Amoco’s Partial Response to Motion for Class
Certification |
|
03/17/95 |
Plaintiffs’
Response to Defendant Amoco Production Company’s Motion to Stay
Determination of Class Action Certification |
|
03/17/95 |
Defendant
Amoco’s Partial Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class
Certification |
|
03/14/95 |
Plaintiffs'
Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended
Complaints |
|
03/14/95 |
Plaintiffs' Brief
in Response to Amoco Production Company's Motion to Dismiss
Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 12(b)(5) |
|
03/08/95 |
Plaintiffs’
Brief in Support of Their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
and for an Order Directing Defendant to Account and Appointing a
Master Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 53 (w/o exhibits) |
|
03/08/95 |
Plaintiffs’
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and for an Order Directing
Defendant to Account and Appointing a Master Pursuant to C.R.C.P.
53 |
|
02/27/95 |
Plaintiffs’
Memorandum in Support of Motion for Class Certification |
|
02/27/95 |
Plaintiffs’
Motion for Class Certification |
|
02/24/95 |
Defendant
Amoco Production Company's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to
C.R.C.P. 12(b)(5) |
|
02/24/95 |
Defendant's
Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaints |
|
01/30/95 |
Plaintiffs’
First Amended Complaint (without exhibits) |
|
01/30/95 |
Plaintiffs'
Memorandum in Response to Defendant Amoco's Motion to Dismiss |
|
01/30/95 |
Defendant Amoco
Production Company's Motion and Supporting Authority to Dismiss
Certain Claims from Plaintiffs' Complaint |
|
12/07/94 |
Order of Remand |
|
10/12/94 |
Notice and
Recommendation of United State Magistrate Judge |
|
08/18/94 |
Plaintiffs'
Reply to Defendant's Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion
for Remand |
|
08/12/94 |
Defendant's
Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand |
|
08/10/94 |
Special Order of
Reference to United State Magistrate Judge |
|
07/19/94 |
Plaintiffs'
Memorandum in Support of Motion to Remand and for Assessment of
Costs and Expenses |
|
07/19/94 |
Plaintiffs'
Motion for Remand |
|
06/27/94 |
Defendant Amoco
Production Company's Motion and Supporting Authority to Dismiss
Certain Claims from Plaintiffs' Complaint |
|
06/27/94 |
Order of Reference to
United States Magistrate Judge |
|
06/21/94 |
Affidavit of Lori
L. Scott |
|
06/21/94 |
Order to
Consolidate Lawsuits 94 CV 105, 94 CV 106, 94 CV 107, 94 CV 108,
94 CV 109, 94 CV 110, and 94 CV 111 |
|
06/20/94 |
Defendant's Notice of
Removal |
|
06/20/94 |
Defendant
Amoco Production Company’s Confession of Motion to Consolidate
Lawsuits |
|
05/26/94 |
Plaintiffs’
Motion to Consolidate Lawsuits 94 CV 105, 94 CV 106, 94 CV 107,
94 CV 108, 94 CV 109, 94 CV 110, and 94 CV 111 |
|
05/16/94 |
Complaint |
|
