(316) 267-7361
Fleeson Logo
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Philosophy
    • History
    • Pictorial History
    • Staff List
    • Representative Clients
  • Class Actions
    • Class Actions
    • Current Case Developments
    • Current Case Profiles
  • News
  • Publications
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Staff List
    • Join Fleeson
    • Make a Payment
Fleeson Logo
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Philosophy
    • History
    • Pictorial History
    • Staff List
    • Representative Clients
  • Class Actions
    • Class Actions
    • Current Case Developments
    • Current Case Profiles
  • News
  • Publications
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Staff List
    • Join Fleeson
    • Make a Payment
Fleeson Logo
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Philosophy
    • History
    • Pictorial History
    • Staff List
    • Representative Clients
  • Class Actions
    • Class Actions
    • Current Case Developments
    • Current Case Profiles
  • News
  • Publications
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Staff List
    • Join Fleeson
    • Make a Payment

Mobil’s Notice of Appeal

by RSM Marketing | Mar 22, 2012 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation

Mobil appealed from the Court’s adverse ruling regarding its breach of the 1984 Settlement Agreement.

Order granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment regarding Mobil’s breach of the 1984 Settlement Agreement

by RSM Marketing | Mar 15, 2012 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation

On March 15, 2012, the Court entered an Order granting plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment on their claim that Mobil breached the 1984 Settlement Agreement.

Case Management Order

by RSM Marketing | Aug 19, 2011 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation

The Court entered a Case Management Order which establishes certain timetables for pretrial matters, and sets a trial date on October 29, 2012.

Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order Determining that Certain Rulings Made by Judge Smith and Affirmed by the Court of Appeals Constitute the Law of the Case

by RSM Marketing | Jul 21, 2011 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation

Plaintiffs’ submitted this Memorandum in support of their motion for an order determining that the prior rulings of Hon. Tom R. Smith on August 18, 2009, and affirmed by the Kansas Court of Appeals, constitute the law of the case.

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order Determining that Certain Rulings Made by Judge Smith and Affirmed by the Court of Appeals Constitute the Law of the Case

by RSM Marketing | Jul 21, 2011 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation

Plaintiffs ask the Court for an order determining that the prior rulings made by Hon. Tom R. Smith on August 18, 2009, and affirmed by the Kansas Court of Appeals, constitute the law of the case.

Order – granting Mobil’s motion for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment

by RSM Marketing | Jun 28, 2011 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation

The court granted Mobil 90 days to conduct discovery and respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
Page 1 of 1112345...10...»Last »

Recent Posts

  • Fleeson Gooing Welcomes Summer Law Clerks
  • Bill Townsley Receives Wichita Bar Association Distinguished Service Award
  • Brooks Severson Appointed Federal Magistrate Judge
  • Amy DeWald Recognized as One of Wichita’s Women Who Lead in Legal Services
  • Adam Burrus Accepted Into Construction Law Society
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

Clients may click here to

Make A Payment

Fleeson, Gooing, Coulson & Kitch, LLC
1900 Epic Center | 301 N. Main St. | Wichita, KS 67202
p. (316) 267-7361 | f. (316) 267-1754

©2023 Fleeson, Gooing, Coulson & Kitch, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap